Hey guys, often we find ourselves asking - is it AI generated? I found this new tool to verify image history, so you can actually check the history of how an image was created. I tested it out with a multimedia image I created and it was bang on. Check it out yourself. Content Credentials --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Here’s my cute little gravy boat. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
I’ve just used it and it’s very accurate! I think the implications are inmense! like for tracking copyrighted images and style “Inspiration”. What do you think Leo Rodman Darin “Doc” Berntson Trenika Blevins ? --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Super interesting. How is the tool able to scan the info? Is Adobe or others building out metadata, like you would see on an iPhone photo or something? Like, if you ripped out all metadata in a copy of an image, could this still be accomplished with a tool like this? --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Yeah, I think they do need to take it to the next step and also include a Google AI aided search. I used a reference image which does belong to Kitchenware. But, It’s under several levels of edits. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
I also made a cute can of beans, although there is quite a bit of PS in here as well, not purely AI. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
I haven’t used anything for images but I did try something for a social media post, and it was completely wrong. I wrote a short LinkedIn post last week. I used gptkit.ai to detect if the content written was generated with AI. It said the post, I wrote was probably 82% fake and 18% real. It left me wondering how many content writers might have been flagged for content that was thought to be written by AI by an AI detector. See the irony there? --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
I’m curious about this bit “It said the post, I wrote was probably 82% fake and 18% real.” What if the 82% “fake” content is simply net-new and in fact real? Or is it going off of natural language to identify what was AI generated? --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Good point. I’m not sure. This is the information I got from their site, “The text submitted for detection is analyzed using 6 different approaches to determine the accuracy level. The results including a report on the authenticity or reality rate of the content, are then displayed to help users achieve good and accurate results. Our detector is trained on 1 Million datasets. Our detector currently has an accuracy of approximately 93%, as determined through testing with a dataset of 100K+ responses from both humans and Chat GPT. Efforts to further improve accuracy are ongoing.” --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Interesting, so it sounds like it’s labelling “fake” as “inaccurate”. Which is alarming if 82% is incorrect! --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Yes, it is. The post was simply encouraging others to continue on their path until they get a “yes.” This is why, I found it strange that it was marked 82% fake. There wasn’t anything based on facts or sources cited. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
When it comes to images, I mostly look at the small details and can tell they are AI-generated. I will try this tool to check website and social media images. I have noticed in ChatGPT, that if you mention certain brands or artists for style inspiration, the image may not generate because it doesn’t want to violate any trademarks. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.