I’d like to be able to add team members to a meeting link and turn OFF the option to check availability. That would eliminate the need to manually add them to meeting invites to attend if they can, but avoid making so many time slots unavailable in the calendar.
Status: Idea Submitted
+1 for this. It’s weird that the toggle is already there but can’t be changed! It would be very helpful to get this fixed.
Hi, I support this idea - my customer is looking forward to toggling off the switch to create simultaneous group meetings with the same members according to their use case. Enabling this would help them achieve their goal. Thanks.
+1 for this ideia. My customers can’t create simultaneous group meetings
the toggle is there.. why can’t the toggle work ![]()
it’s like a light switch .. but nothing happens
Why would there be a “Check Availabilty” box in the settings of a meeting link if you can not uncheck this box? Strange UX.
Yes, Please!
+1 -- very confused about why the toggle button is present but can’t be used.
Completely agree, this is extremely frustrating.
+1 please implement this basic feature that is already mostly engineered ![]()
Agree 100% with this need. I have a lead gen specialist who uses meeting links to get prospects to click on and we track the meetings she obtains for the team. It would be helpful to add her to the group meeting and uncheck the toggle button so she is optional and not required for her calendar to be considered, this way she knows the meeting was booked and can log the activity appropriately.
+1 - its there already, seems illy its not allowed.
PLEASE! This is highly needed ![]()
+1 please do make updates on this
+1 ! You already have the switch there!
+1 please update!
++1 please add this. There is no point to the toggle if it is non-functional.
Not having this causes a lot of confusion for our team. I need two team members to be added on a meetings link without checking their calendars so that we have higher avialable meeting times. Please fix this!
+1 to this as well!
Any update on this?
