I'm curious if anyone has had markedly different results for sequence-send campaigns where emails chain under the first sent, or are sent separately with new subject lines.
To me, it makes sense to have them stack on one reply thread, but while writing a new set of segmented sequences, I'm finding that there's a little less wiggle room for persuasion and narrative (especially when I'm shooting for 100 words or less!)
Hey there @JMartin1094 - that's such a good question. I'm hoping folks with more sequence sends than I've completed weigh in and offer real-world experience.
I teach clients my perspective, but it's not backed up with hard data.
Like you, I'm a fan of threads if I'm trying to keep a conversation going with related information. But if I'm trying to tell multiple "stories" in my messaging, I'm going to not thread them so I can have new subject lines.
I also try to avoid the "RE: Subject line" hack it seems so many sales messages have. If I've never interacted with them, or at least sent one initial email, I don't want it to look like I'm playing that trick.
Just my two cents.
Did my answer help? Please "mark as a solution" to help others find answers. Plus I really appreciate it!
I typically prefer to use new subject line for each email. That way, with a new subject line, you can test open rates better since most people open on a new subject line, but if they missed the first one, their inbox sort of collapses one against the other. So if you thread it, and they don't connect with the first subject line/value proposition, the next one gives you a chance to get back in there. Readers decide which emails to read based on Subject Line so I think the threading on a colder outreach is risky.
Agree - I like separate threads, but have seen a few use cases where a threaded reply has been successful. It usually only works if they opened the first email and the threaded reply comes next. After that, it has diminishing returns.
If my reply answered your question please mark it as a solution to make it easier for others to find.
I typically prefer to use new subject line for each email. That way, with a new subject line, you can test open rates better since most people open on a new subject line, but if they missed the first one, their inbox sort of collapses one against the other. So if you thread it, and they don't connect with the first subject line/value proposition, the next one gives you a chance to get back in there. Readers decide which emails to read based on Subject Line so I think the threading on a colder outreach is risky.
Hi @Alysha_TW this sounds like a really good opportunity to run an A/B test across a sequence, creating one that has a single subject line with replies and the other with unique subject lines. You could use a workflow with a random split branch to enroll the contacts into one of the two sequences and compare the results.
would love to know what you learn if you run the test!
If my reply answered your question please mark it as a solution to make it easier for others to find.
Now that they have A/B Test for Seqeunces you could def do that! I think the question was more about if you should thread subject lines and I prefer to use separate subject lines and not thread.
Agree - I like separate threads, but have seen a few use cases where a threaded reply has been successful. It usually only works if they opened the first email and the threaded reply comes next. After that, it has diminishing returns.
If my reply answered your question please mark it as a solution to make it easier for others to find.
Hey there @JMartin1094 - that's such a good question. I'm hoping folks with more sequence sends than I've completed weigh in and offer real-world experience.
I teach clients my perspective, but it's not backed up with hard data.
Like you, I'm a fan of threads if I'm trying to keep a conversation going with related information. But if I'm trying to tell multiple "stories" in my messaging, I'm going to not thread them so I can have new subject lines.
I also try to avoid the "RE: Subject line" hack it seems so many sales messages have. If I've never interacted with them, or at least sent one initial email, I don't want it to look like I'm playing that trick.
Just my two cents.
Did my answer help? Please "mark as a solution" to help others find answers. Plus I really appreciate it!
Also, if anybody else has anything to add and/or share, please feel free to join in the conversation 🙂
Thank you so much and have a brilliant day!
Best, Bérangère
HubSpot’s AI-powered customer agent resolves up to 50% of customer queries instantly, with some customers reaching up to 90% resolution rates. Learn More.