We are replacing Autopilot with Hubspot for our marketing Automation connected to Salesforce. We already have fields like "MQL Date". I noticed that the setup created this field in Hubspot; however, there is already a field "Marketing Qualified Lead". Should I:
a) Use this custom field in Hubspot and just ignore the default Marketing Qualified Lead-- eg. standard fields don't have much native functionality; or,
b) Map Marketing Qualified Lead to SFDC MQL Date and then delete the custom field in Hubspot called MQL Date. ie. standard functionality fields are very important.
Hi @mayhem9 It's your choice. If it's working for you, then you might continue using it. You can map any fields to SFDC.
However, in this case, I'd suggest using HubSpot standard contact properties. Because, when a lead becomes MQL, HubSpot automatically sets the Became a marketing qualified lead date. Also, please note that Marketing Qualified Lead is a lifecycle stage (HubSpot contact property: Lifecycle Stage). Became a marketing qualified lead date is a contact property itself.
We've been using standard lifecycle stage and date, but we have created a custom property for Lead Status.
Agreed with @Aakar! For the date fields updated in HubSpot using the lifecycle stage changes, you're not able to update the date manually with import anyway so it would be hard to use that for historical data. This article may be helpful.
To your point about not using Lifecycle Stage, @mayhem9, I recommend that all Salesforce customers use Lifecycle Stages as it helps delineate because leads, contacts, and customers. HubSpot will assign a Lifecycle Stage whether you decide to strategically use it or not, so it's best to take advantage of it! I usually have Lifecycle Stage = Lead if Salesforce Lead ID is known & Salesforce Contact ID is unknown & Lifecycle Stage is not more advanced than Lead. If lead qualification is in place, I automate the progression of Lifecycle Stage to match (MQL + SQL) and then use customer, opportunity, and other accordingly. Regardless of how you define it, I'd recommend considering the use of Lifecycle Stages. 🙂
Agreed with @Aakar! For the date fields updated in HubSpot using the lifecycle stage changes, you're not able to update the date manually with import anyway so it would be hard to use that for historical data. This article may be helpful.
To your point about not using Lifecycle Stage, @mayhem9, I recommend that all Salesforce customers use Lifecycle Stages as it helps delineate because leads, contacts, and customers. HubSpot will assign a Lifecycle Stage whether you decide to strategically use it or not, so it's best to take advantage of it! I usually have Lifecycle Stage = Lead if Salesforce Lead ID is known & Salesforce Contact ID is unknown & Lifecycle Stage is not more advanced than Lead. If lead qualification is in place, I automate the progression of Lifecycle Stage to match (MQL + SQL) and then use customer, opportunity, and other accordingly. Regardless of how you define it, I'd recommend considering the use of Lifecycle Stages. 🙂
I also learned that Marking Qualified Date is an automation populated field based on the lifecycle field, so in my case where I will not be using lifecycle, I need to keep the customer MQL Date.
However, you need to make sure when your lead becomes MQL (custom property), the HubSpot MQL date gets updated, either via SFDC or via workflows. Otherwise, HubSpot won't be able to create/update the MQL date.
Hi @mayhem9 It's your choice. If it's working for you, then you might continue using it. You can map any fields to SFDC.
However, in this case, I'd suggest using HubSpot standard contact properties. Because, when a lead becomes MQL, HubSpot automatically sets the Became a marketing qualified lead date. Also, please note that Marketing Qualified Lead is a lifecycle stage (HubSpot contact property: Lifecycle Stage). Became a marketing qualified lead date is a contact property itself.
We've been using standard lifecycle stage and date, but we have created a custom property for Lead Status.