Great minds think alike

At the moment there are only two options when creating a channel, regular and private.  ...read more

Hubspot recently changed the source of property change history to a more general one ("Hubspot processing" in this screeenshot below for example), while previously it showed exactly which integration or which workflow caused the change.     This update is very harmful because if a property is changed unintended, I can no longer track which specific source that caused the change. The feature helped me identify so many issues, or even just intended behaviors from my predecessor when I took a new job.    Please consider bringing it back, it's a feature I used almost everyday. ...read more

The Note Body in any Hubspot report currently allows us to hover over the note to be able to see the entire note.   Can there be a way to look at the entire body of the note, in full, in the report? Basically just like how the Text Wrap feature works on an excel file.   This would really help in adding comments against every contact showing up in a report and seeing them as a whole ...read more

Feature request:   Add separate read and write scopes for "content" scope so that API access can be limited to only read blog posts without the write access   Current: The private app access token with scope "content" can make both of these API calls: GET/cms/v3/blogs/posts POST/cms/v3/blogs/posts   Expected: The private app access token has separate read and write "content" scope so that: read: can only make this API call GET/cms/v3/blogs/posts (without the POST access) write: can only make this API call POST/cms/v3/blogs/posts   This is based on the community topic here   Thanks. ...read more

It's not possible to create a report showing deals with hostorical stage values in order to compare two periods. Ex : how many deals were in X stage during this period and how many now. We can only use the current deal stage.  ...read more

When creating forms, we should be able to use the same property multiple times. ...read more

It would be very useful when pulling leads into the prospecting tool that we are not limited to leads who have entered specific lifecyle stages within the last 180 days but could have the option of choosing 'all time'.  ...read more

Apparently most Hubspot users operating in Europe send out Meeting Links to exising contacts instead of embedding them on their websites. When collecting personal data from prospects all of us need to make sure we have the explicit consent to process that data. The Hubspot Forms in the Marketing Tools in fact pay respect to that by enabling Hubspot users to add/edit the respective field to the form: after enabling GDPR settings generally or for a specific form you can edit the form and under other form fields add or edit the GDPR field; the drop down let's you choose between legitimate interest, - which you should choose only if you know what you are doing - a checkbox for consent for communication and a simple text for data processing (which is standard for no reason if you ask me), or checkboxes for both consent for communication and consent for data processing (the latter is then automatically a required field as it should be). Only the last option is the safe option here; the "standard option" should only be used if you already have this contact in your crm and have the consent from another source; it is practical when you additionally want your contact to join a marketing list for example.   Now to the actual issue I and basically all Hubspot users operation in the EU have: when we send out a Meetink Link to a contact we obviously do have the consent from another source to process their data or we would be in dangerous violation of the GDPR. BUT when we want to embed the meeting link on a website to turn prospects into leads I need to have that additional consent for data processing checkbox. Sadly when we edit the form that is integrated into the Meeting Link there is no way to add that. Although it would have been logical to add it here when it was added to the GDPR form field... this was pretty new in 2020 IIRC... so apparantly nobody noticed this discrepancy in the last 3 years. Except I pointed it out 3 years ago while working for a different company. So how about someone at Hubspot implements the same option Forms have to the Meeting Link forms? That would be nice... and GDPR compliant. ...read more

A feature to allow users to create a template for deal names or other object properties so that users can have a internal naming convention. For example: xxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Best case would be for it to be set immediately after creating the deal.   ...read more