Great minds think alike

There needs to be more granular control over how to manage consent for customers that have their own external websites.   At the moment it is not possible to integrate hubspot's consent popup or modal into a customer's existing consent solution and it is not an option to have more than one consent solution appearing on any one page.   Providers such as OneTrust offer comprehensive consent solutions which a vendor like Hubspot is more than capable of integrating with.   Note that the 'idea category' selected here is probably inaccurate but this platform does not provide any option for a catchall such as 'other', or allow the customer to enter their own category. ...read more

Hello,   we are using the sales Tool integration in Outlook to log Email to Companys, contacts and Deals. Our Sales Stage has the buckets won and lost. If a deal is lost or won i do not want it to show up in the outlook integration as an option to log.   Now we can handle it since we do not have more than 2-3 deals per customer. But in a few month or years i will not be able to chose which of the eg 20 deals which sound similar i wanted to log the email.   Thanks for your help. ...read more

Hello! 🙂   There appears to be some oversights present in the public app marketplace's application form, located in the 'Pricing' section.    I've spotted two issues;   1) Pay-as-you-go pricing is limited to whole cents only. Many API products are priced per API call, and many have fractional cent pricing, e.g. $0.009, you can cirumvent this frontend field limitation by stating for example that $0.90 is per 100 API calls, but for accuracy sakes when a HubSpot customer compares this to the app partners own pricing page it should match up. The pricing section is for the apps listing only, the app's pricing is not charged or controlled by HubSpot, so I don't know why this limitation exists, all it does is create discrepencies between the HubSpot app listing pricing and the app partners web page pricing.    2) 'Contact us' as a pricing tier once selected requires mandatory selections of 'Starts from' and 'Frequency'. Again, an oversight. If 'Contact us' is selected then it is a stand alone statement, the app partner should not be forced to enter a price from or a frequency (which just so happens to only offer 'One time', 'Monthly' & 'Yearly'... counter intuitive to the pay-as-you-go options.).   If you need more info just let me know or DM me.    Regards, Alexander ...read more

There should be a field type 'roll-up' that aggregates values accros hierarchies, everywhere a top hierarchy aggregates values from below. This would be relevant to aggregate values in account hierarchies (ABM) or across deals (total revenue) or across contacts in deals/accounts (last visit, total number of views, etc ). The solutions should be a combination of value (what) and formula (how). The roll-up field should have the same type as the aggregated value and offer a number of formulas how to proceed depending on the value type (totals, average, last date, first date, top of picklist, bottom of picklist, etc.). Salesforce does this quite elegantly in their reporting.  Having this, would get you many happy customers.  ...read more

Hi team! I worked with a customer on a workflow to copy objects with property values captured in a radio select type property to a multiple checkbox type property. This can be done by enrolling all contacts/companies with known values in the radio select type property and assigning them a value in the corresponding multiple checkbox type property with an if/then branch. That being said, the customer has several properties to move over and it does require a fair bit of time to set up these workflows and build each branch for each value, it would be great if could convert these property types easily, assuming the internal values of both properties match 🙂 ...read more

Hi team I worked with a customer who requested for the ability to export the full list of reports and dashboards currently in their portal. I understand that we do not currently have this feature. Use case: Customer has 900+ reports in their portal and they need an overview of all these reports and who they are currently being owned by, so as to ascertain if some of these reports should be assigned to another user. Currently there isn't an in-app way to export this information.  ...read more

Please add an option to select members who can be available for live chat ...read more

Hi It will be useful to be able to conduct AB test on blog template as well, like landing page and webpage.  Thanks ...read more

[deleted] ...read more