Pipeline - Require Object Association and/or Labels

[arlogilbert]

More and more we're building workarounds to require associations & labels. The utility of both is hampered by the inability to require their existence on deals (for example, but other types of pipelines we have the same needs such as tickets & some of our custom objects that have pipelines).

Here are two use cases and the messy workarounds:

1. We want to require that a contact with a label exists to be in a specific stage (e.g. require at least one contact with the "Champion" label to be in the "Consideration" stage. Our solution to this was a custom boolean field "Has Contact Champion" and a workflow that sets the value based on whether a contact is associated. We then require that this field be set, but we restrict the ability to set the field so our reps can't move a deal unless a champion is associated. It works fine but it is at it's core a cludgy workaround that is prone to breaking if we add/change stages or add/change labels.
2. We wan to require that a company is associated with a deal - similar solution. We could use a calculated field here, but then we couldn't use access permissions to a field as a mechanism to prevent moving a deal to a stage.

The ability to require a contact & a company be associated with a deal feels like functionality that is missing and should exist. No CRM customer ever has sold a deal that didn't have a customer or a contact, and no B2B company in history has ever sold without a company and a contact. This is one of those features that has me shaking my head.

The ability to require a custom object association or to require an association label feel less like gaps than temporary gaps since the products themselves are both new, but eventually it will feel like a big gap.

Also, association labels on custom objects would be awfully nice also (for contacts & companies) and at least at our company, every one of our 4 custom objects would benefit from being able to flag associations.

2 cents. Hope y'all implement these 🙂

[BastiSchuhl]

I couldn't agree more! 

Enforcing associations of Contacts, Companies, and Deals is a very old community request. Check out this Idea from 2017 with almost 500 Upvotes: https://community.hubspot.com/t5/HubSpot-Ideas/Company-and-contact-info-mandatory-to-create-a-DEAL/i...

Adding Custom Objects to that list makes total sense.

In addition, Association Labels are a very powerful new feature. Unfortunately, like many new features, they fall short in flexibility and customization (for the time being). Without a way to enforce association labels, CRM data will never be bullet proof, which makes the labels quite useless for now.

Would love to see this! 🙂

[Saper]

Very critical stuff! Definitely should be implemented asap.

[TH7]

Yes please help us make contact x deal association labels mandatory.

It is important to see the overlap between job functions (job role) and association labels (deal role) to optimize GTM strategy.

[SPu]

Hi, we also need this feature as many of our upcoming workflows after a phase change are dependend on that associations. Please take a look into that feature.

[RafaelMartins]

It is availble in beta.
https://app.hubspot.com/product-updates/19929829/in-beta?query=label&update=13934263

[OllieS]

We're in the beta for association labels being added during object creation, but disappointed there isn't the option to specify a label for Companies associated to a Deal. I accept it's necessary to have a "Primary", but we often want to add an extra label (i.e. is the company the end-user or a distributor). Please open up this option.