Field dependencies in Playbooks

[Monjogard]

Would be very useful with some smartness to questions in Playbooks (similar to dependent fields in HubSpot forms), e.g. ff answer is  X on question 1, show question 1B, otherwise move on to question 2.

A Playbook can become quite tedious for a sales rep to scroll through when not all questions are relevant to the conversation.

Also great if a Playbook could update properties on multiple objects within the same Playbook. Now a feature!

[MdeWit9]

Need this too. A prospect is currently using Typeform €300/year) and is able to use dependancies in their playbook form questions. 

[CSic]

+1

[Brandon7051]

Definatley need this feature as other Form companies do. 

[LauGil]

This is necesary! 

[AdminEpicDanta]

This is 100% needed. 

[lauragil]

Is this feature on the roadmap?

[JMannessen1]

+1 Would be great and usefull! 

[Dr_Aur]

We need this !!!!

[McBainKD]

+1 just came across the need for this today!!

[MRuff4]

+1

[SkeeStylus]

We can do this in qualifying leads on chatbots and would be helpful to have branching logic in playbooks.

[BBellon]

Playbooks are a very cool feature but practically useless without conditional questions.

[Courtney_Clark]

Developers... please work on this. 🙂

[ErikaJ]

Absolutely critical to making playbooks worth using for live scenarios. When trying to convert a series of Yes or No questions into a playbook, it's difficult for teams to navigate where they should go next when they have to search through the playbook for the correct next step.