I assumed we could adjust the percentages as I've used this w/ an equal split w/ a few workflows. Then I had one where I wanted to adjust the percentages manually and learned this wasn't possible. While not perfect and it lacks some granularity, I created a random distribution branch in my workflow with 10 branches. Branches 1, 2, 3 and 4 held the main work flow. I directed branch 5,6 to branch 1 thus giving this a 30% chance of hitting branch 1. Branch 7,8 pointed to 2. And 9, 10 pointed to 3 which gave me the distribution i was looking for: 30%, 30%, 30% and 10%. Ideal? No, but it works.
100%!!!!!!!!!!! Generally A/B testing is done with a small portion of customers (ie 10%) to start off with. To get that type of split, we have to separate each email into x10 versions to get that type of split. And that's for one email in a workflow. What if we have 2+ emails in a workflow??.. the number of branches exponentially grows and becomes unusable!
PLEASE can we get customisable random distribution options! Pleeeeease!!!!!! (and thank you).
In our lead assignment process, we need flexible weighted splits to ensure a fair assignment of new leads. Currently, we’re forced to use custom code for a weighted lead rotation – which works, but adds unnecessary complexity and makes maintenance harder.
A native feature for weighted random splits (including custom percentages) would make these workflows far more reliable, scalable, and accessible for teams who manage lead assignment.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.