Thanks for replying @cpieri.
@cpieri wrote:
I'd love to understand a bit more about why you are so hesitant to embrace the freemium model for your product.
I'm new to the area, so I was just concerned that the model feels coercisive. At this stage, I only want to know if the need for the product is strong, and I was worried that if I use a coercisive tactic, I might be tricked into thinking there's a strong need for the product when there really isn't.
@cpieri wrote:
Hey @raymondcarl!
No matter how great a product is today people typically feel much more comfortable investing in something if they have tried it a bit before they end up paying for it. As such, I don't think there is necessarily any 'issue' with your product if you are seeing more success with the freemium model, rather this is just how consumers prefer to consumer products these days.
That's good to know because if this is what consumers expect, then I'm less concerned that adoption is less driven by coercian rather than need.
@cpieri wrote:Also $1/month is a very low cost so its possible you'd be able to charge a bit more when you go through a freemium model (and it's like investors would like to see you charging more if you are going down the angel or VC route).
Yeah, thanks. I'm going to raise the price in the next round of testing because I think there's a signal being sent that the product isn't that good if I'm only charging $1.