I'd advise against this – if you have the feeling that the deal will continue at some point, it should stay in the stage it's currently in. When you create time in deal stage reports, you will then have a better understanding which stages are typically the ones that deals get stuck in. An additional stage would prevent this kind of insight.
Additionally, there is a risk that you'll have to move deals back in deal stages, which will also break certain funnel reports.
Instead, if you want to flag or easily identify these deals, I'd recommend the following:
Deal Stages - Process paused stage - how to implement?
resolver
@RThomas7 thanks for clarifying. For me, the downsides outweigh the benefits. HubSpot expects deals to stay within the same pipeline and downstream, more features might be affected than just the mentioned reports.
Personally, I don't think there is such thing as a paused deal. Either a deal is closed lost due to inactivity or a deal has a next activity date – in which case it's just a matter of removing it from a view, should one not want to see these types of deals. Even then, it should still sit within the deal stage that corresponds to how far this deal has gotten. A paused stage or pipeline, in my opinion, opens up the door to bad data quality (marking a deal as paused as opposed to logging the next activity, scheduling a follow-up or document a closed lost reason).
Karsten Köhler HubSpot Freelancer | RevOps & CRM Consultant | Community Hall of Famer
Hi @BalintSipos - I thought about this all day and here's how you can pull it off. Create a separate Deal pipeline for Paused deals.
This way all data is retained and you can enforce that the deal progresses forward when it goes back to the original pipeline.
This would also be advantageous for your reporting so that you don't report on paused deals.
If you do this, HubSpot reports based on entering and leaving deal stages will not work as expected, even after the deal is moved back from its paused pipeline. Deals shouldn't be moved back and forth between pipelines.
Karsten Köhler HubSpot Freelancer | RevOps & CRM Consultant | Community Hall of Famer
Deal Stages - Process paused stage - how to implement?
resolver
@karstenkoehler good point. To clarify the reporting would not work for reports that track how long deals spend in each stage, conversion rates between stages, and overall pipeline velocity.
Deal Stages - Process paused stage - how to implement?
resolver
@RThomas7 thanks for clarifying. For me, the downsides outweigh the benefits. HubSpot expects deals to stay within the same pipeline and downstream, more features might be affected than just the mentioned reports.
Personally, I don't think there is such thing as a paused deal. Either a deal is closed lost due to inactivity or a deal has a next activity date – in which case it's just a matter of removing it from a view, should one not want to see these types of deals. Even then, it should still sit within the deal stage that corresponds to how far this deal has gotten. A paused stage or pipeline, in my opinion, opens up the door to bad data quality (marking a deal as paused as opposed to logging the next activity, scheduling a follow-up or document a closed lost reason).
Karsten Köhler HubSpot Freelancer | RevOps & CRM Consultant | Community Hall of Famer
I'd advise against this – if you have the feeling that the deal will continue at some point, it should stay in the stage it's currently in. When you create time in deal stage reports, you will then have a better understanding which stages are typically the ones that deals get stuck in. An additional stage would prevent this kind of insight.
Additionally, there is a risk that you'll have to move deals back in deal stages, which will also break certain funnel reports.
Instead, if you want to flag or easily identify these deals, I'd recommend the following: