1. 
Absolutely! No more random deductions. 2. 
Nope, I need a human to understand my struggles. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
No --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Will trust, while AI received #PHD --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Absolutely 
As a teaching assistant for a marketing class, I appeal to ChatGPT (A LOT) to help me grade. It’s very accurate and helpful with efficiency, but I tend to tweak the feedback before sending it out to students. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Definitely! they are better equipped to provide constructive feedback and also point out wherever you made an error! --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
As long as a human has eyes on what the AI is doing and the professor isn’t blindly handing everything over to the AI, I reckon I could be okay with it. Blind acceptance of the situation, no. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.
Doesn’t AI already grade some of the HubSpot cert exams after a fashion? It’s a logical extension from taking an online test and having it graded against a static set of correct answers, which has been the norm for 20 years or more (I have been taking online cert exams since 2002).. I think if it was AI along with a human proctor it would be OK. --- This post was migrated from connect.com and was originally published at an earlier date.