# with webhook API can I use port other than 443 for HTTPS webhook

**URL:** <https://community.hubspot.com/t/with-webhook-api-can-i-use-port-other-than-443-for-https-webhook/62915>\
**Category:** APIs & Integrations\
**Created:** [August 12, 2022, 2:37pm UTC](https://community.hubspot.com/t/with-webhook-api-can-i-use-port-other-than-443-for-https-webhook/62915 "2022-08-12T14:37:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Murray62](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d2c977/32.png) [@Murray62](https://community.hubspot.com/u/Murray62)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2022, 2:37pm UTC](https://community.hubspot.com/t/with-webhook-api-can-i-use-port-other-than-443-for-https-webhook/62915/1 "2022-08-12T14:37:58Z")

</div>

Building a webhook API integration and my client does not want to use port 443 but rather something more discreet like 1043 or even 1960. I want to know if I can specifiy a port number on the webhook registrtion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Teun](https://d10pqhm3lwygmk.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.hubspot.com/teun/32/28739_2.png) [@Teun](https://community.hubspot.com/u/Teun)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2022, 9:11am UTC](https://community.hubspot.com/t/with-webhook-api-can-i-use-port-other-than-443-for-https-webhook/62915/2 "2022-08-15T09:11:56Z")

</div>

Hi @Murray62 ,

Based on this [post](https://community.hubspot.com/t5/APIs-Integrations/Webhook-Subscriptions-Target-Url-Including-port-in-url-no-longer/m-p/249030), I assume you can simply define the port in your URL. So you could try setting [example.com:1043](http://example.com:1043) as the Webhook URL.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Murray62](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d2c977/32.png) [@Murray62](https://community.hubspot.com/u/Murray62)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2022, 12:24pm UTC](https://community.hubspot.com/t/with-webhook-api-can-i-use-port-other-than-443-for-https-webhook/62915/3 "2022-08-15T12:24:10Z")

</div>

Thank you Teun for that response.
