I’m going to start by echoing Matthew’s post - thank you all for taking time to attend the webinar and to ask great questions. Additionally, please be sure to follow this post to get notifications for additional comments with answers.
Here is the next batch of questions and answers:
Q: The age old question: How do we get through the spam filters? And what are some of the HubSpot best practices for getting past those filters.
A: If mail is getting stuck in a spam filter that has been configured by the recipient’s IT team on their mail server, have the recipient allowlist your sending IPs or sending domain (what’s behind the @ symbol).
If the mail is being directed to a spam folder, or if the recipient is using a free address and doesn’t have access to allowlisting, a reputation repair and attention to email strategy will need to happen in order to improve inbox placement.
Q: Is it true that sender emails starting with “info” or are more likely to be sent to spam so it is better to personalize the sender email with the name of the sender or go along with “hello@blabla.com”?
A: Not necessarily, but it’s going to be beneficial to be consistent and use a recognizable name/email. For inbox placement, the sending domain’s reputation (in this case @blabla.com) is going to have the most impact on inbox placement.
Q: Does this mean that if my colleagues (in the same company, same email domain) have a lot of bounces, that affects me?
A: Yes. All sends from the same domain are going to be impacted by other sends from that domain.
Q: Why is verbal consent less reliable than exchange of business cards without explicit consent to be emailed? someone might just give a card because they’re given one, out of politeness.
A:
Verbal consent is difficult to track and verify. Many ESPs require verifiable consent to be tracked as they may require the original source of consent to be provided if a direct complaint is ever submitted directly to the ESP about the sender. Verifiable consent also allows for strategy changes and database review to be streamlined if there is a source that is over performing or underperforming.
In the case of the business card, it’s an approved source of verifiable consent in HubSpot, but it isn’t always the healthiest form of consent. I would say that if someone doesn’t seem as though they are going to be engaging with the brand’s mail, they’re probably best to leave off of the recipients list.
A good practice here is to send a follow-up email with a CTA allowing for those that provided a business card to confirm that they’d like to receive marketing emails from the brand. Many customers will do this immediately after an event to identify the best contacts based on that confirmation. It’s important to note that this method cannot be used to gain consent, but it can be used to confirm consent (in this case the consent was provided by a business card exchange).
Q: Do prospecting emails count as marketing emails?
A: If the mail is sent from a marketing email tool utilizing an ESP’s network, they do (and will require verifiable consent to be sent marketing emails before sending). If the mail is being sent from a 1:1 inbox or an inbox that has been connected to HubSpot, they do not.
Q: If you send to large batch of data (3k+) and for example, a couple 100 contacts are at the same company, therefore same ISP - will that result in higher risk of landing in their spam?
A: This depends on a lot of factors. If you have direct consent from the contacts to send the mail, they have engaged with mail from your brand in the past, and this send is normal volume for your brand, there probably won’t be any large spikes in spam placement.
However, if you’re sending to contacts that haven’t provided consent or contacts that haven’t engaged with your brand recently, both would lead to a higher likelihood that mail would be delivered to a spam or junk folder.
Additionally, healthy senders are sending a steady volume of mail throughout the month. A large spike in volume can look suspicious and lead to spam folder placement.
Lastly, reputation will always play a large role in deliverability. If your brand is struggling with inbox placement before this send, this send will likely also have the same issues independent of the points above.
Thank you!