Hi there -
I had the same issue - a great many of the things I used in our old lead score were not possible in the new lead score, without using lists and as you said, property criteria only works under Fit. Making it more complex, we only score B2B contacts so I needed to be able to differentiate. So this is the solution I used:
I created two scores—one called B2B Engagement Score and one called B2B Fit Score. Both are combined scores, which allowed me to take full advantage of everything available for both types of scores. Both can add up to 100.
For example, under the Engagement Score, I have a set of property based scores inculding “List membership belongs to all of B2B Page Engagement Within Month” which is a list that rolls up all our B2B related pages, and contains people who have engaged within thirty days. A similar property based score under Engagement is “List membership belongs to all of Days Since Last B2B Email Click Less than 14 Days.”
After I’d sorted out my Fit and Engagement criteria into those two scores, I created a field called B2B Lead Score which is a calculated field that totals Engagement and Fit into one score, up to 200.
I also got fancy and set up a Hot/Warm/Cold threshold system but that’s not necessary - by having two scores, I was losing the A1-C3 visual and wanted to work around to keep that. I like color coding.
By doing it this way, I was able to work around all the limitations in the new score and be really granular. It works great.
Hope that gives you some ideas!
Eileen
I’m looking for my next role!
https://www.linkedin.com/in/eileenparzek/