Please help us understand and resolve an internal debate about how best to track various attributes of assets.
Say for example, that you want to track the performance of blog posts assets across multiple dimensions. I’ve heard advice to create a campaign for each dimension, but that seems messy over time, and not the right tool.
Take this scenario:
You write a blog post associated with a black friday incentive, and it features product 3 and 5 of your suite, and it’s TOFU position, and it mentions your new AI feature that’s a big deal, and it has a freelance contributor that you want to track but they are not to be listed as the author.
It’s been suggested that I need to set up a campaign for all of those elements, separately, as they can each span other posts, other campaigns, etc.
So, a campaign for
-Black Friday
- TOFU funnel position (to see how that’s doing vs MOFU or BOFU assets/topics)
- AI topic, so we can see if our blog discussing AI are performing better than those without.
- for product 3
- for product 5
- associated with freelance contributor X
If there were an asset object, we could set up any properties we want to associate with it, and check them off when the blog is created. But there is only one campaign field. So, it seems like to track the various dimensions, after posting the blog post and picking one campaign, I would have to go back and find all the campaigns associated, and add the asset to them. And would have to do that every time I post a blog, to get the full picture of some aspects across all blog posts, like funnel position, or product mention. And that would also mean I’d need a campaign selected for every blog post, which doesn’t seem to fit with the general idea of a campaign, or the examples listed in the KB article about campaign types.
Seems like if I could add a property field to a blog asset, similar to the blog tag property, then I could create the fields to track for the asset, vs many campaigns to keep adding assets to.
Educate me? Thoughts?
