<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to Manage Contact Lifecycles in Enterprise Companies in Tips, Tricks &amp; Best Practices</title>
    <link>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234867#M8573</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.hubspot.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1023318"&gt;@DBP0604&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;could you maybe specify again what you mean by "correct contact" in terms of associating it to a deal?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The flipside of the answer would be: You would associate those contacts to the deals whose lifecycle stage you want to see updated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.hubspot.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1023318"&gt;@DBP0604&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, since you mentioned it, I’d love to hear why you believe it’s better to work with leads instead of contacts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Contacts, by design, flatten information. If there are multiple outreaches, multiple buyer's journeys, upselling, crossselling etc, then it's not possible to have these multiple facets reflected in a single lead status or lifecycle stage field. It's one field with one value but a bouqet of potentially many different documented touchpoints.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the lead object, you would simply create a new lead record for each new potential you want to pursue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>karstenkoehler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-17T10:01:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to Manage Contact Lifecycles in Enterprise Companies</title>
      <link>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234070#M8565</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have many enterprise companies with thousands of associated contacts. We want to implement lifecycle rules on &lt;STRONG&gt;contacts&lt;/STRONG&gt; based on &lt;STRONG&gt;deal stages&lt;/STRONG&gt;, but we can’t apply lifecycle updates to &lt;EM&gt;all&lt;/EM&gt; contacts from a company based on a deal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even when a company has a deal marked as Closed Won, most of the associated contacts are not involved in the deal. Many of them may still be prospects and may not even be aware of the purchase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Updating their lifecycle stages based on the deal would be inaccurate and would lead to incorrect customer communications, since usually only a small group within the company is involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, we don’t want to rely on the sales team manually tagging or selecting the relevant contacts — the solution needs to be &lt;STRONG&gt;automated and scalable&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How should lifecycles be handled in this scenario, when lifecycle stages must be driven by deal data but cannot be applied to all contacts associated with the company?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234070#M8565</guid>
      <dc:creator>DBP0604</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-15T17:47:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Manage Contact Lifecycles in Enterprise Companies</title>
      <link>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234092#M8566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.hubspot.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1023318"&gt;@DBP0604&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Step one would be to disable the default automations and sync of the company lifecycle stage:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://knowledge.hubspot.com/object-settings/manage-how-lifecycle-stages-sync-between-objects?hubs_content=knowledge.hubspot.com/records/use-lifecycle-stages&amp;amp;hubs_content-cta=lifecycle-stage-automation-settings" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledge.hubspot.com/object-settings/manage-how-lifecycle-stages-sync-between-objects?hubs_content=knowledge.hubspot.com/records/use-lifecycle-stages&amp;amp;hubs_content-cta=lifecycle-stage-automation-settings&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once you have this, you're free to define your own rules using contact and company based workflows, for example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Lead workflow: enroll contacts when they meet lead criteria, then use 'Edit record' to update lifecycle stage to lead, followed by 'Edit record' to apply the same to the associated company&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Qualified lead workflow:&amp;nbsp;enroll contacts when they meet qualified lead criteria, then use 'Edit record' to update lifecycle stage to lead, then qualified lead, followed by 'Edit record' to apply the same to the associated company&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Opportunity workflow: enroll contacts when they're associated to an open deal, then use 'Edit record' to update lifecycle stage to lead, followed by 'Edit record' to apply the same to the associated company&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Customer workflow:&amp;nbsp;enroll contacts when they're associated to a won deal, then use 'Edit record' to update lifecycle stage to lead, then qualified lead, then opportunity, then customer, followed by 'Edit record' to apply the same to the associated company&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That accomplishes a few things:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You get full control over what changes a lifecycle stage.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You avoid lifecycle stage skipping (which is a pain in reports).&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Only contacts actually associated to a deal are marked as opportunity.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind that the lifecycle stage in HubSpot works best when you consider it how far a contact has gotten, not where they currently stand.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cross-selling and up-selling within an enterprise might be best handled with the leads object and reporting on that, not by looking at the lifecycle stage of contacts or companies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234092#M8566</guid>
      <dc:creator>karstenkoehler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-15T18:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Manage Contact Lifecycles in Enterprise Companies</title>
      <link>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234861#M8572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karsten,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply — much appreciated. I’m still not sure what the best practice is to associate the correct contacts to a deal, since I can’t simply create a rule that associates all contacts with every deal a company has. Do you have any thoughts on that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, since you mentioned it, I’d love to hear why you believe it’s better to work with leads instead of contacts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234861#M8572</guid>
      <dc:creator>DBP0604</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-17T09:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Manage Contact Lifecycles in Enterprise Companies</title>
      <link>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234867#M8573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.hubspot.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1023318"&gt;@DBP0604&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;could you maybe specify again what you mean by "correct contact" in terms of associating it to a deal?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The flipside of the answer would be: You would associate those contacts to the deals whose lifecycle stage you want to see updated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.hubspot.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1023318"&gt;@DBP0604&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, since you mentioned it, I’d love to hear why you believe it’s better to work with leads instead of contacts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Contacts, by design, flatten information. If there are multiple outreaches, multiple buyer's journeys, upselling, crossselling etc, then it's not possible to have these multiple facets reflected in a single lead status or lifecycle stage field. It's one field with one value but a bouqet of potentially many different documented touchpoints.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the lead object, you would simply create a new lead record for each new potential you want to pursue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hubspot.com/t5/Tips-Tricks-Best-Practices/How-to-Manage-Contact-Lifecycles-in-Enterprise-Companies/m-p/1234867#M8573</guid>
      <dc:creator>karstenkoehler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-17T10:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

